<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is VBA in Excel 2007 Slower Than in Excel 2003?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://excelhints.com/2009/01/07/is-vba-in-excel-2007-slower-than-in-excel-2003/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://excelhints.com/2009/01/07/is-vba-in-excel-2007-slower-than-in-excel-2003/</link>
	<description>Excel Tips and Tricks for All Levels</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:36:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://excelhints.com/2009/01/07/is-vba-in-excel-2007-slower-than-in-excel-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://excelhints.com/?p=532#comment-776</guid>
		<description>It would not surprise me. By my own testing, Office 2007 is slower than 2003: http://forums.extremeoverclocking.com/showpost.php?p=2984108&amp;postcount=1

2007 also adds more syntax, which is going to slow down the processing engine.

2007 is a piece of crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would not surprise me. By my own testing, <a href="http://excelhints.com/recommends/officelive" style=""  rel="nofollow" >Office</a> 2007 is slower than 2003: <a href="http://forums.extremeoverclocking.com/showpost.php?p=2984108&amp;postcount=1" rel="nofollow">http://forums.extremeoverclocking.com/showpost.php?p=2984108&amp;postcount=1</a></p>
<p>2007 also adds more syntax, which is going to slow down the processing engine.</p>
<p>2007 is a piece of crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
